Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60045
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNicolas Becuen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndreas Neefen_US
dc.contributor.authorPepijn Schreinemachersen_US
dc.contributor.authorChapika Sangkapituxen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T03:37:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-10T03:37:35Z-
dc.date.issued2008-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn02648377en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-42149186939en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=42149186939&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60045-
dc.description.abstractSystem models in agriculture and natural resource management are usually developed by researchers to advise policy makers on the likely outcomes of alternative scenarios. Except for data collection, stakeholders-like farm households-are rarely involved in the research process. Companion modeling (ComMod) has been developed as a modeling approach to include various stakeholders in a continuous feedback loop between researchers and stakeholders. Whereas other ComMod approaches have used role playing games as an interface between researchers and stakeholders-assuming that stakeholders have difficulties understanding a computer model-this paper explores the potential of a participatory modeling approach in which stakeholders are directly confronted with the model by assessing its assumptions, interpreting simulation results, and suggesting scenarios. The approach is applied to two villages in a watershed in northern Thailand. One lowland village, populated by farmers of mostly Thai ethnic origin, depends partially on an upland village inhabited by farmers of Hmong ethnic origin for its water supply. Water scarcity has led to conflicts between these two villages in the past. In three rounds of participatory simulation sessions the potential of the ComMod model was tested. Our findings confirm that researchers face particular challenges in making local stakeholders understand the model as a reproduction of reality and not as reality itself. The idea of a scenario as a hypothetical situation was also difficult to convey. An ex-post analysis among participants showed that farmers who attended several sessions had a clear understanding of the model and one-third of the participants thought it useful to exchange points of view with the other community and to define new collective rules for water sharing. Applying ComMod in a context that is characterized by social tensions and power differentials, however, needs careful consideration of the potential implications on less powerful actors. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleParticipatory computer simulation to support collective decision-making: Potential and limits of stakeholder involvementen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleLand Use Policyen_US
article.volume25en_US
article.stream.affiliationsCNRS Centre National de la Recherche Scientifiqueen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversitat Hohenheimen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.