Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60018
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorC. Ekkapobyotinen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Padungtoden_US
dc.contributor.authorR. Chuanchuenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T03:37:20Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-10T03:37:20Z-
dc.date.issued2008-12-10en_US
dc.identifier.issn01681605en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-55549090666en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.09.005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=55549090666&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60018-
dc.description.abstractEighty-three swine isolates of Campylobacter coli were tested for mechanisms underlying resistance to nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin and tetracycline. Four isolates harbored class 1 integrons but none carried class 2 and 3 integrons. Most of the tetracycline-resistant isolates (97%) possessed tet(O). A Thr-86-Ile substitution in GyrA and an A-2230-G mutation in 23S rRNA were the main resistance mechanisms for quinolones and erythromycin, respectively. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.titleAntimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter coli isolates from swineen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Food Microbiologyen_US
article.volume128en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChulalongkorn Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.