Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59366
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPatima Silsupadolen_US
dc.contributor.authorVipul Lugadeen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnne Shumway-Cooken_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul van Donkelaaren_US
dc.contributor.authorLi Shan Chouen_US
dc.contributor.authorUlrich Mayren_US
dc.contributor.authorMarjorie H. Woollacotten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T03:14:22Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-10T03:14:22Z-
dc.date.issued2009-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn09666362en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-63249102281en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.01.006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=63249102281&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59366-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency of three different balance training strategies in an effort to understand the mechanisms underlying training-related changes in dual-task balance performance of older adults with balance impairment. Elderly individuals with balance impairment, age 65 and older, were randomly assigned to one of three individualized training programs: single-task (ST) balance training; dual-task training with fixed-priority (FP) instruction; and dual-task training with variable-priority (VP) instruction. Balance control during gait, under practiced and novel conditions, was assessed by calculating the center of mass and ankle joint center inclination angles in the frontal plane. A smaller angle indicated better balance performance. Other outcomes included gait velocity, stride length, verbal reaction time, and rate of response. All measures were collected at baseline and the end of the 4-week training. Results indicated that all training strategies were equally effective (P > .05) at improving balance performance (smaller inclination angle) under single-task contexts. However, the VP training strategy was more effective (P = .04) in improving both balance and cognitive performance under dual-task conditions than either the ST or the FP training strategies. Improved dual-task processing skills did not transfer to a novel dual-task condition. Results support Kramer et al.'s proposal that VP training improves both single-task automatization and the development of task-coordination skills. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleTraining-related changes in dual-task walking performance of elderly persons with balance impairment: A double-blind, randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleGait and Postureen_US
article.volume29en_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Oregonen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Washington, Seattleen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.