Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59298
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorB. Tuetunen_US
dc.contributor.authorW. Choochoteen_US
dc.contributor.authorY. Pongpaibulen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Junkumen_US
dc.contributor.authorD. Kanjanapothien_US
dc.contributor.authorU. Chaithongen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Jitpakdien_US
dc.contributor.authorD. Riyongen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Wannasanen_US
dc.contributor.authorB. Pitasawaten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T03:13:32Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-10T03:13:32Z-
dc.date.issued2009-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn09320113en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-63849255246en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s00436-008-1224-9en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=63849255246&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59298-
dc.description.abstractThe potential of G10, a celery (Apium graveolens)-based topical product, as a repellent against natural mosquito populations was evaluated in comparison to commercial (Insect Block 28) and standard (25% DEET) repellents in Chiang Mai province, northern Thailand. These repellent products afforded encouragingly excellent personal protection against a broad range of mosquito species belonging to various genera, including Aedes, Anopheles, Armigeres, Culex, and Mansonia. No mosquito bite was observed on the volunteers treated with G10 and Insect Block 28 throughout the field study, whereas two species, i.e., six A. barbirostris and two A. subalbatus, came to bite or land on 25% DEET-treated volunteers. Thus, it can be concluded that while G10 and Insect Block 28 exhibited similarly powerful repellent activities with complete (100%) protection, 25% DEET was effective in minimizing bites with 99.68% protection. G10 formula was also studied for physical properties and biological stability after being kept under two conditions; a heating and cooling cycle, and varying temperature and time storage. Most samples of stored G10 not only demonstrated a similarity in appearance and physical properties, but also provided comparable repellency to that of the fresh preparation. These findings encourage commercial development of G10 formula as an alternative to conventional synthetic repellents. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.en_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectVeterinaryen_US
dc.titleField evaluation of G10, a celery (Apium graveolens)-based topical repellent, against mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Chiang Mai province, northern Thailanden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleParasitology Researchen_US
article.volume104en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsPayap Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.