Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/58140
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSethapong Sethaboupphaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuriyah Tongmuneeen_US
dc.contributor.authorChollachai Kamtawaien_US
dc.contributor.authorJittanan Kawilananen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T04:20:22Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T04:20:22Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn21862982en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85042550549en_US
dc.identifier.other10.21660/2018.46.7261en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85042550549&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/58140-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 GEOMATE International Society. A post-liquefaction study at a remote village was conducted after the event of the 6.3 ML2014 Chiang Rai Earthquake in order to investigate the liquefaction condition and to compare liquefaction potential assessment methods for future use. Site surveying, aerial map study, standard penetration test were conducted and found that the subsoil at this site was easily liquefied because the village was lying within abandon river channels with very loose sand layer from the depth of approximately 1 to 6 meters underneath the cohesive soil layer of 1 - 1.5 meter thick at the surface. Four liquefaction potential assessment methods commonly used in the United States and in Japan: 1) modified Seed and Idriss' 1971 method; 2) Idriss and Boulanger (2014); 3) Iwasaki's 1990 method; and 4) Iwasaki's 1996 method were examined. The comparison demonstrates that Iwasaki' 1990 method yielded quite a different result from other three methods with the lowest values of a factor of safety. From this study, other three methods may be considered more favorable.en_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEarth and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleA post-liquefaction study after the 2014 Chiang Rai Earthquake in Thailanden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Journal of GEOMATEen_US
article.volume14en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.