Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57723
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Alexandriah Alas | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Orawee Chinthakanan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Luis Espaillat | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Leon Plowright | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Vivian Aguilar | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | G. Willy Davila | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-05T03:48:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-05T03:48:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-04-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 14333023 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 09373462 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-84988391719 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1007/s00192-016-3132-3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988391719&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57723 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2016, The International Urogynecological Association. Introduction and hypothesis: We aimed to evaluate the success of suburethral slings in women ≥70 years of age. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent suburethral sling placement. Subjects were separated into three groups: ≤50 years of age (group 1), 51 to 69 years of age (group 2), and ≥70 years of age (group 3). The primary aim was to evaluate success as defined by ≥ improved on a validated patient improvement satisfaction score and a negative postoperative standardized stress test. Results: There were 1,464 subjects. Mean age was 44.51 ± 4.25 (n = 296) for group 1, 60.5 ± 5.28 (n = 680) for group 2, and 77.68 ± 5.41 (n = 488) for group 3. The median follow-up was 26 (6–498) weeks, 45 (6–498) weeks, and 42 (6–543) weeks, for groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated no difference in sling success according to age stratification. Lower success was associated with having had a previous sling (adjusted OR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.12–0.5), having detrusor overactivity (adjusted OR 0.44, 95 % CI 0.28–0.69), and having a history of urge urinary incontinence (UUI) for ≥ 4 years (adjusted OR 0.54, 95 % CI 0.31–0.95). Conclusions: There is no difference in sling success between the elderly and younger populations. However, those with previous sling surgery or a long standing history of UUI may be at a higher risk of failure. | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Are suburethral slings less successful in the elderly? | en_US |
dc.type | Journal | en_US |
article.title.sourcetitle | International Urogynecology Journal | en_US |
article.volume | 28 | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Cleveland Clinic Florida | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Chiang Mai University | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.