Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56799
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSuleeporn Wongcharoenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomporn Sungkaraten_US
dc.contributor.authorPeeraya Munkhetviten_US
dc.contributor.authorVipul Lugadeen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatima Silsupadolen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T03:30:24Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T03:30:24Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18792219en_US
dc.identifier.issn09666362en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84998829059en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.11.036en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84998829059&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56799-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Elsevier B.V. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of four different home-based interventions on dual-task balance performance and to determine the generalizability of the four trainings to untrained tasks. Sixty older adults, aged 65 and older, were randomly assigned to one of four home-based interventions: single-task motor training, single-task cognitive training, dual-task motor-cognitive training, and dual-task cognitive–cognitive training. Participants received 60-min individualized training sessions, 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Prior to and following the training program, participants were asked to walk under two single-task conditions (i.e. narrow walking and obstacle crossing) and two dual-task conditions (i.e. a trained narrow walking while performing verbal fluency task and an untrained obstacle crossing while counting backward by 3 s task). A nine-camera motion capture system was used to collect the trajectories of 32 reflective markers placed on bony landmarks of participants. Three-dimensional kinematics of the whole body center of mass and base of support were computed. Results from the extrapolated center of mass displacement indicated that motor-cognitive training was more effective than the single-task motor training to improve dual-task balance performance (p = 0.04, ES = 0.11). Interestingly, balance performance under both single-task and dual-task conditions can also be improved through a non-motor, single-task cognitive training program (p = 0.01, ES = 0.13, and p = 0.01, ES = 0.11, respectively). However, improved dual-task processing skills during training were not transferred to the novel dual task (p = 0.15, ES = 0.09). This is the first study demonstrating that home-based dual-task training can be effectively implemented to improve balance performance during gait in older adults.en_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleHome-based interventions improve trained, but not novel, dual-task balance performance in older adults: A randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleGait and Postureen_US
article.volume52en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsWhitaker International Programen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.