Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56365
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKatharine Jacobsen_US
dc.contributor.authorLouis Lebelen_US
dc.contributor.authorJames Buizeren_US
dc.contributor.authorLee Addamsen_US
dc.contributor.authorPamela Matsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorEllen McCulloughen_US
dc.contributor.authorPo Gardenen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorge Salibaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTimothy Finanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T03:15:30Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T03:15:30Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-26en_US
dc.identifier.issn10916490en_US
dc.identifier.issn00278424en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84964770479en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1073/pnas.0813125107en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84964770479&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56365-
dc.description.abstractManaging water for sustainable use and economic development is both a technical and a governance challenge in which knowledge production and sharing play a central role. This article evaluates and compares the role of participatory governance and scientific information in decision-making in four basins in Brazil, Mexico, Thailand, and the United States. Water management institutions in each of the basins have evolved during the last 10-20 years from a relatively centralized water-management structure at the state or national level to a decision structure that involves engaging water users within the basins and the development of participatory processes. This change is consistent with global trends in which states increasingly are expected to gain public acceptance for larger water projects and policy changes. In each case, expanded citizen engagement in identifying options and in decision-making processes has resulted in more complexity but also has expanded the culture of integrated learning. International funding for water infrastructure has been linked to requirements for participatory management processes, but, ironically, this study finds that participatory processes appear to work better in the context of decisions that are short-term and easily adjusted, such as water-allocation decisions, and do not work so well for longer-term, high-stakes decisions regarding infrastructure. A second important observation is that the costs of capacity building to allow meaningful stakeholder engagement in water-management decision processes are not widely recognized. Failure to appreciate the associated costs and complexities may contribute to the lack of successful engagement of citizens in decisions regarding infrastructure.en_US
dc.subjectMultidisciplinaryen_US
dc.titleLinking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources managementen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Americaen_US
article.volume113en_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Arizonaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsArizona State Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsColumbia University in the City of New Yorken_US
article.stream.affiliationsStanford Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsBill and Melinda Gates Foundationen_US
article.stream.affiliationsInstitute of the Environmenten_US
article.stream.affiliationsMcKinsey and Co.en_US
article.stream.affiliationsBaltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Managementen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.