Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56140
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohn R. Miklosen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrawee Chinthakananen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert D. Mooreen_US
dc.contributor.authorGretchen K. Mitchellen_US
dc.contributor.authorSheena Favorsen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeborah R. Karpen_US
dc.contributor.authorGina M. Northingtonen_US
dc.contributor.authorGladys M. Nogueirasen_US
dc.contributor.authorG. Willy Davilaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T03:09:30Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T03:09:30Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn14333023en_US
dc.identifier.issn09373462en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84971238755en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s00192-015-2913-4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84971238755&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56140-
dc.description.abstract© 2015, The International Urogynecological Association. Introduction and hypothesis: The objective was to report patterns of sling and transvaginal mesh-related complications using the IUGA/ICS classification of prosthesis-related complications. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent surgical removal of sling, transvaginal mesh, and sacrocolpopexy for mesh-related complications from 2011 to 2013 at three tertiary referral centers. The International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) classification system was utilized. Results: We identified 445 patients with mesh complications, 506 pieces of synthetic mesh were removed, and 587 prostheses-related complications were classified. 3.7 % of patients had viscus organ penetration or vaginal exposure as their presenting chief complaint and 59.7 % were classified as not having any vaginal epithelial separation or category 1. The most common category was spontaneous pain (1Be: 32.5 %) followed by dyspareunia (1Bc: 14.7 %). The sling group was 20 % more likely to have pain compared with the pelvic organ prolapse (POP) mesh group (OR 1.2, 95 % CI 0.8–1.6). The most commonly affected site (S2) was away from the suture line (49 %). Compared with the sling group, the POP group had a higher rate of mesh exposure, which mostly occurred at the suture line area. The majority of patients presented with mesh-related complications more than 1 year post-insertion (T4; average 3.68 ± 2.47 years). Conclusion: Surgeons should be aware that patients with vaginal mesh complications routinely exhibit complications more than 1 year after the implantation with pain as the most common presenting symptom.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe IUGA/ICS classification of synthetic mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: a multicenter studyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Urogynecology Journalen_US
article.volume27en_US
article.stream.affiliationsInternational Urogynecology Associatesen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsEmory Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsCleveland Clinic Floridaen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.