Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54911
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWarisa Wisittipanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorChompoonoot Kasemseten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T10:28:01Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T10:28:01Z-
dc.date.issued2015-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn16851994en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85047991018en_US
dc.identifier.other10.12982/cmujns.2015.0093en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85047991018&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54911-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. This study addressed warehouse storage location assignment problems (SLAP) to minimize total travelling distances in an order-picking process. The problem was formulated and presented as a mixed integer programming model. The LINGO optimization solver was then used to find solutions for a set of generated problems. The results showed that the LINGO optimization solver easily attained optimal solutions for small-sized problems; however, as the problem size increased, computational time increased rapidly. Eventually, when the problem size became very large, LINGO was unable to find solutions. Due to the competence limitations of the exact solution method, this research presented two effective metaheuristic approaches - Differential Evolution (DE) and Global Local and Near-Neighbor Particle Swarm Optimization (GLNPSO) - to solve SLAP. To illustrate the performance of the algorithms, the numerical results were evaluated and compared with a set of generated problems. The experimental results showed that, for small-sized problems, DE and GLNPSO found optimal solutions equal to those obtained from LINGO, with fast computing times. For medium-sized problems, DE and GLNPSO were not significantly different in terms of solution quality, but DE found solutions approximately twice as fast as GLNPSO. For large-sized problems, DE was significantly superior to GLNPSO in terms of both solution quality and computational times. The average DE solutions, obtained from five independent runs, were equal to or better than those obtained from GLNPSO in all large-sized instances. In addition, DE showed faster convergence behavior than GLNPSO, since it yielded better solutions while using a fewer number of function evaluations.en_US
dc.subjectMultidisciplinaryen_US
dc.titleMetaheuristics for warehouse storage location assignment problemsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleChiang Mai University Journal of Natural Sciencesen_US
article.volume14en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.