Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54061
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPanatda Jannoeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeerathep Pongpraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorSaisamon Lumyongen_US
dc.contributor.authorSittiruk Roytrakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorMika Nomuraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T10:07:14Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T10:07:14Z-
dc.date.issued2015-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18363644en_US
dc.identifier.issn18360661en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84924874541en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84924874541&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54061-
dc.description.abstractThe brown planthopper (BPH) is a pest which destroys rice paddy fields. To determine the molecular mechanism of the resistance of rice plants to BPH, the proteomic profiles of two contrasting rice cultivars, TN1 (susceptible) and PTB33 (resistant), were compared. This information was then used to investigate protein expression during BPH feeding. Rice seedlings were inoculated with BPH nymphs to screen for resistance behavior among five selected cultivars. Following inoculation, small BPHs were introduced to the rice seedlings at a ratio of 8:1 (BPH: rice seedling) and the hopperburn symptom on each cultivar was measured over the fourteen day period of observation. The samples demonstrating the highest resistance to BPH (PTB33) and susceptibility (TN1) were then chosen for protein extraction and comparison. An observed total of nineteen protein spots demonstrated significant differences between the two cultivars, with a two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) approach adopted to identify the results of the experiment. The protein spots were then categorized into different groups according to the presence of a carbohydrate metabolism, antioxidants, protein synthesis, ATP synthesis, photosynthesis and stress response proteins. 2-Cys peroxiredoxin BAS1 (2-CysPrx-BAS1), putative inorganic pyrophosphatase (IPPase) and eukaryotic elongation factor 1 (EF-1) were reported to be 2.09, 2.25 and 2.22-fold up-regulated in resistant cultivar, respectively. It has also been shown that fructokinase (FK) and phosphoglyceratemutase (PGmutase) were only found using CBB staining in resistant cultivar, but not in susceptible cultivar. The protein up-regulation observed in the resistant cultivar might promote glycolysis and lignin biosynthesis via the phenylpropanoid pathway, which offers such plants protection against BPH infestation.en_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.titleComparative proteomic analysis of two rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.) contrasting in brown planthopper (BPH) stress resistanceen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitlePlant OMICSen_US
article.volume8en_US
article.stream.affiliationsNaresuan Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsThailand National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnologyen_US
article.stream.affiliationsKagawa Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.