Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53872
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThikamporn Rangsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSupaporn Chinchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorSarinya Sriphetcharawuten_US
dc.contributor.authorSuchitporn Lersilpen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:59:59Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:59:59Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn23348496en_US
dc.identifier.issn2334847Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85010471335en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85010471335&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53872-
dc.description.abstract© 2014, Association for the Development of Science, Engineering and Education. All rights reserved. The Dynamic Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment for Children (DOTCA-Ch) is a tool for finding our about cognitive problems in school-aged children. However, the DOTCA-Ch was developed in English for Western children. For this reason, it’s not appropriate for Thai children because of the differences of culture and language. The objectives of this study were aimed at translating the DOTCA-Ch in Orientation, Spatial Perception, and Thinking Operations sub tests to a Thai version on a World Health Organization back-translation process, and to examine its internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability. Participants consisted of 38 intellectually impaired and learning disabled individuals between the ages of 6–12 years. Results from this study revealed high internal consistency in the Orientation sub test (α=.83) Spatial Perception sub test (α=.82) and Thinking Operations sub test (α=.82); high inter-rater reliability in the Orientation sub test (ICC =.83), Spatial Perception sub test (ICC =.84) and Thinking Operations sub test (ICC =.74); and high test-retest reliability in the Orientation sub test (ICC =.84), Spatial Perception sub test (ICC =.86), and Thinking Operations sub test (ICC =.85). These results indicate that the Thai version of the Orientation, Spatial Perception, and Thinking Operations sub test might be used as an appropriate assessment tool for Thai children, based on psychometric evidence including internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability. However, additional study of other psychometric properties, including, predictive validity, concurrent reliability, and inter-rater reliability during the mediation process of this assessment tool needs to be carried out.en_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleReliability of the dynamic occupational therapy cognitive assessment for children (DOTCA-CH): Thai version of orientation, spatial perception, and thinking operations subtestsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Educationen_US
article.volume2en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.