Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53814
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTippawan Prapamontolen_US
dc.contributor.authorKunrunya Sutanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSompong Laoyangen_US
dc.contributor.authorSurat Hongsibsongen_US
dc.contributor.authorGrace Leeen_US
dc.contributor.authorYukiko Yanoen_US
dc.contributor.authorRonald Elton Hunteren_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Barry Ryanen_US
dc.contributor.authorDana Boyd Barren_US
dc.contributor.authorParinya Panuweten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:58:46Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:58:46Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1618131Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn14384639en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84897075867en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.10.005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84897075867&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53814-
dc.description.abstractWe report two analytical methods for the measurement of dialkylphosphate (DAP) metabolites of organophosphate pesticides in human urine. These methods were independently developed/modified and implemented in two separate laboratories and cross validated. The aim was to develop simple, cost effective, and reliable methods that could use available resources and sample matrices in Thailand and the United States. While several methods already exist, we found that direct application of these methods required modification of sample preparation and chromatographic conditions to render accurate, reliable data. The problems encountered with existing methods were attributable to urinary matrix interferences, and differences in the pH of urine samples and reagents used during the extraction and derivatization processes. Thus, we provide information on key parameters that require attention during method modification and execution that affect the ruggedness of the methods. The methods presented here employ gas chromatography (GC) coupled with either flame photometric detection (FPD) or electron impact ionization-mass spectrometry (EI-MS) with isotopic dilution quantification. The limits of detection were reported from 0.10. ng/mL urine to 2.5. ng/mL urine (for GC-FPD), while the limits of quantification were reported from 0.25. ng/mL urine to 2.5. ng/mL urine (for GC-MS), for all six common DAP metabolites (i.e., dimethylphosphate, dimethylthiophosphate, dimethyldithiophosphate, diethylphosphate, diethylthiophosphate, and diethyldithiophosphate). Each method showed a relative recovery range of 94-119% (for GC-FPD) and 92-103% (for GC-MS), and relative standard deviations (RSD) of less than 20%. Cross-validation was performed on the same set of urine samples (n= 46) collected from pregnant women residing in the agricultural areas of northern Thailand. The results from split sample analysis from both laboratories agreed well for each metabolite, suggesting that each method can produce comparable data. In addition, results from analyses of specimens from the German External Quality Assessment Scheme (G-EQUAS) suggested that the GC-FPD method produced accurate results that can be reasonably compared to other studies. © 2013 Elsevier GmbH.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleCross validation of gas chromatography-flame photometric detection and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry methods for measuring dialkylphosphate metabolites of organophosphate pesticides in human urineen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Healthen_US
article.volume217en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsRollins School of Public Healthen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.