Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53772
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArintaya Phrommintikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorWanwarang Wongcharoenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSrun Kuanpraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorNarawudt Prasertwitayakijen_US
dc.contributor.authorRungsrit Kanjanavaniten_US
dc.contributor.authorSiriluck Gunaparnen_US
dc.contributor.authorApichard Sukonthasarnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:57:26Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:57:26Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn16715411en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84904464565en_US
dc.identifier.other10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2014.02.007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84904464565&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53772-
dc.description.abstractBackground: It is well-established that influenza vaccination reduces adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD), however, the vaccine coverage rate in most countries remains low. The concern about the local adverse effects of intramuscular injection, particularly in CVD patients receiving antithrombotic therapy, is one of the important impediments. This study was conducted to assess the safety, side effects and tolerability of intradermal influenza vaccine in CVD patients. Methods: This was an observational study in adult CVD patients who had undergone vaccination against seasonal influenza by intradermal vaccination between May 16th and May 30th, 2012 at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital. The medical history, patients' acceptability and adverse effects were collected using a written questionnaire completed by the patient immediately following vaccination and by a telephone survey eight days later. Results: Among 169 patients, 52.1% were women and the mean age was 63 ± 12 years. Coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease and dilated cardiomyopathy were present in 121 (71.6%), 40 (23.7%) and 8 (4.7%), respectively. Antithrombotics were used in 89.3%. After vaccination, the pain score was 0, 1 or 2 (out of 10) in 44.4%, 15.1%, and 27.6% of the patients, respectively. Eight days after vaccination, the common adverse reactions were itching 19 (11.9%), swelling 9 (5.7%) and fatigue (4.7%). No hematoma or bruising was reported. Conclusions: The intradermal influenza vaccination is safe and well tolerates with high rates of satisfaction in CVD patients. This technique should be useful in expanding influenza vaccine coverage. ©2014 JGC All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleSafety and tolerability of intradermal influenza vaccination in patients with cardiovascular diseaseen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Geriatric Cardiologyen_US
article.volume11en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.