Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53312
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWarat Winiten_US
dc.contributor.authorGary Gregoryen_US
dc.contributor.authorMark Clevelanden_US
dc.contributor.authorPeeter Verleghen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:46:48Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:46:48Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn02651335en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84897952463en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1108/IMR-01-2012-0001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84897952463&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53312-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to re-conceptualize the distinction between global and local brands, providing a more comprehensive framework, which considers both geographical distribution and ownership. It examines main and interactive effects of consumers' perceptions of these factors, and studies how ethnocentrism (CET) and price affect brand evaluations, considering a range of price difference thresholds. Design/methodology/approach: A preliminary study (n=243) examined main and interaction effects of brand globalness and ownership on consumers' brand quality attitudes and purchase intentions in four different product categories. The main study (n=558) further explored brand ownership effects by examining the interaction of CET and price differences. Findings: The preliminary study confirmed the distinctiveness of brand globalness and ownership. Consumers evaluated global (vs non-global) brands more positively, regardless of brand ownership (local vs foreign). The main study found that effects of price and CET varied considerably across product categories. Research limitations/implications: Limitations include the use of student samples from a single country (Thailand), and of scenarios instead of real life purchase decisions. Practical implications: The findings suggest that perceived brand globalness positively impacts brand evaluations. Companies may cultivate a global brand image by emphasizing global cues. Local origin allows (global) brands to command a price premium, although this varies across product categories. An emphasis on globalness seems valuable, especially for local brands. Originality/value: This research offers a refined conceptualization of brand globalness, a key construct in international marketing. Additional value is provided by studying price effects, which have received limited attention in international marketing, and substantial data collection (total N>800) in an understudied yet important economy (Thailand). © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.en_US
dc.subjectBusiness, Management and Accountingen_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Financeen_US
dc.titleGlobal vs local brands: How home country bias and price differences impact brand evaluationsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Marketing Reviewen_US
article.volume31en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW) Australiaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsWestern Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Amsterdamen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.