Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52894
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorN. Pattamapaspongen_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Srisuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorC. Sivasomboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Nasutoen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Suwannahoyen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Settakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Kraisarinen_US
dc.contributor.authorG. Guglielmien_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:34:17Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:34:17Z-
dc.date.issued2013-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn00338362en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84877930099en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s11547-012-0844-4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84877930099&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52894-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of conventional radiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting foreign bodies by using cadaver feet. Materials and methods: One hundred and sixty foreign bodies consisting of 5×2-mm fresh wood, dry wood, glass, porcelain and plastic fragments were randomly placed in the plantar soft tissue of the forefoot and sole. An additional 160 incisions were made without the insertion of foreign bodies. Radiographs, CT and MRI scans were assessed in a blinded fashion for the presence of a foreign body. Results: Overall sensitivity and specificity for foreign body detection was 29% and 100% for radiographs, 63% and 98% for CT and 58% and 100% for MRI. The sensitivity of radiography was lower in the forefoot. CT and MRI detection rates depended on the attenuation values of the foreign bodies and on the susceptibility artefact, respectively. CT was superior to MRI in identifying waterrich fresh wood. Conclusions: Radiography, CT and MRI are highly specific in detecting foreign bodies but sensitivity is poor. The detection rate depends on the type of foreign body for all techniques and on location for radiography. To identify foreign bodies with MRI, pulse sequences should be used to enhance the susceptibility artefact. In water-rich wood, as in chronically retained wood, CT is more accurate than MRI. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAccuracy of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing foreign bodies in the footen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleRadiologia Medicaen_US
article.volume118en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversita degli Studi di Foggiaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsIRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenzaen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.