Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52594
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorImjai Chitapanaruxen_US
dc.contributor.authorPimkhuan Kamnerdsupaphonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNantaka Pukanhapanen_US
dc.contributor.authorEkkasit Tharavichitkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoy Vongtamaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:27:48Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:27:48Z-
dc.date.issued2013-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn13499157en_US
dc.identifier.issn04493060en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84888263886en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1093/jrr/rrt054en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84888263886&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52594-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) vs accelerated hyperfractionation with concomitant boost (CCB) as a primary treatment for patients with Stage 3-5 squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN). A total of 85 non-metastatic advanced SCCHN patients were accrued from January 2003 to December 2007. Of these, 48 and 37 patients received CCRT and CCB, respectively. The patients were randomized to receive either three cycles of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil plus conventional radiotherapy (CCRT, 66 Gy in 6.5 weeks) or hybrid accelerated radiotherapy (CCB, 70 Gy in 6 weeks). The primary endpoint was determined by locoregional control rate. The secondary endpoints were overall survival and toxicity. With a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 3-102), the 5-year locoregional control rate was 69.6% in the CCRT arm vs 55.0% in the CCB arm (P = 0.184). The 5-year overall survival rate was marginally significantly different (P = 0.05): 76.1% in the CCRT arm vs 63.5% in the CCB arm. Radiotherapy treatment interruptions of more than three days were 60.4% and 40.5% in the CCRT arm and CCB arm, respectively. The median total treatment time was 55.5 days in the CCRT arm and 49 days in the CCB arm. The rate of Grade 3-4 acute mucositis was significantly higher in the CCB arm (67.6% vs 41.7%, P = 0.01), but no high grade hematologic toxicities were found in the CCB arm (27.2% vs 0%). CCRT has shown a trend of improving outcome over CCB irradiation in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectPhysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.titleRandomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck canceren_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Radiation Researchen_US
article.volume54en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsSt Teresa Comprehensive Cancer Centeren_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.