Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52593
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNgufor L. Atangaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnna C. Treydteen_US
dc.contributor.authorRegina Birneren_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:27:46Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:27:46Z-
dc.date.issued2013-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn2073445Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85006309948en_US
dc.identifier.other10.3390/land2040726en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85006309948&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52593-
dc.description.abstract© 2013 by the authors. Livestock production is a key income source in eastern Africa, and 80% of the total agricultural land is used for livestock herding. Hence, ecological and socio-economically sustainable rangeland management is crucial. Our study aimed at selecting operational economic, environmental and social sustainability indicators for three main pastoral (P), agro-pastoral (AP), and landless intensive (LI) small scale livestock production systems for use in sustainability assessment in Ethiopia. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through grey literature and semi-structured interviews, assessing livestock and feed resources, production technology, land tenure, financial and gender issues. Our results suggested that feed shortages (FS) are directly related to grazing pressure (G) and inversely related to grass recovery rates (R). According to our indicators, AP was the most sustainable while P and LI were only conditionally sustainable production systems. 93% of 82 interviewees claimed that private land ownership was the best land tenure incentive for efficient rangeland management. Farmers perceived Prosopis juliflora expansion, sporadic rainfall, and disease infestation as the most significant causes for decreasing livestock productivity. Landless intensive farmers had the highest equality in income distribution (Gini Index: GI = 0.4), followed by P and AP (each with a GI = 0.5). Neither educational background nor income seemed to determine grazing species conservation efforts. We claimed that sustainability indicators are valuable tools to highlight shortcomings and strengths of the three main livestock production systems and help with future livestock management in Ethiopia. Selecting suitable indicators, however, is crucial as data requirements and availability can vary across livestock systems.en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleAssessing the sustainability of different small-scale livestock production systems in the Afar Region, Ethiopiaen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleLanden_US
article.volume2en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversitat Hohenheimen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.