Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52184
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWimalin Laosiritawornen_US
dc.contributor.authorTunchanit Bunjongjiten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:21:50Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:21:50Z-
dc.date.issued2013-11-27en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252526en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84888105458en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84888105458&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52184-
dc.description.abstractStatistical process control (SPC) plays a significant role in hard-disk drive manufacturing as there is a crucial need to constantly improve of productivity. Control chart is one of the SPC tools that have been widely implemented to identify whether nonrandom pattern caused by assignable cause exists in the production process. Decision rules are usually used for detecting nonrandom patterns on control chart. However, recent research has shown that these rules had tendency of producing false alarm. This is a problem occurred in the case study company, who is a manufacturer of metal frame for actuator. The company is adopting technologically advanced equipment for its quality assurance system and computer software for data analysis and control chart. Currently, the company use decision rules for detecting nonrandom patterns on control chart - for example, if 6 or more consecutive data inputs found to be in an increasing or decreasing order, these data contain trend pattern. In attempt to improve the accuracy of data analysis, this research investigated the application of 3 classification techniques, namely neural network, k-nearest neighbor and rule induction, in discretion of nonrandom patterns. By considering the control charts of 3 different product lines, 3 types of nonrandom patterns, which are Trend, Cycle and Shift, are to be observed. Based on the real data inputs, the percentage of accuracy in error detection by each technique of each product line is compared. It is found the accuracy of k-nearest neighbor is highest with the percentage of correctly prediction between 96.99 - 98.7%.en_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectChemistryen_US
dc.subjectMaterials Scienceen_US
dc.subjectMathematicsen_US
dc.subjectPhysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.titleClassification techniques for control chart pattern recognition: A case of metal frame for actuator productionen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleChiang Mai Journal of Scienceen_US
article.volume40en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.