Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51923
Title: Ovarian cancer and body size: Individual participant meta-analysis including 25,157 women with ovarian cancer from 47 epidemiological studies
Authors: V. Beral
C. Hermon
R. Peto
G. Reeves
L. Brinton
P. Marchbanks
E. Negri
R. B. Ness
P. H.M. Peeters
M. Vessey
E. E. Calle
S. M. Gapstur
A. V. Patel
L. Dal Maso
R. Talamini
A. Chetrit
G. Hirsh-Yechezkel
F. Lubin
S. Sadetzki
N. Allen
D. Bull
K. Callaghan
B. Crossley
K. Gaitskell
A. Goodill
J. Green
T. Key
K. Moser
R. Collins
R. Doll
C. A. Gonzalez
N. Lee
H. W. Ory
H. B. Peterson
P. A. Wingo
N. Martin
T. Pardthaisong
S. Silpisornkosol
C. Theetranont
B. Boosiri
S. Chutivongse
P. Jimakorn
P. Virutamasen
C. Wongsrichanalai
A. Tjonneland
L. Titus-Ernstoff
T. Byers
T. Rohan
B. J. Mosgaard
D. Yeates
J. L. Freudenheim
J. Chang-Claude
R. Kaaks
K. E. Anderson
A. Folsom
M. A. Rossing
D. B. Thomas
N. S. Weiss
E. Riboli
F. Clavel-Chapelon
D. Cramer
K. Robien
S. S. Tworoger
D. Cramer
S. E. Hankinson
S. S. Tworoger
S. Franceschi
C. La Vecchia
C. Magnusson
T. Riman
E. Weiderpass
A. Wolk
L. J. Schouten
P. A. Van den Brandt
N. Chantarakul
S. Koetsawang
D. Rachawat
D. Palli
A. Black
A. Berrington de Gonzalez
D. M. Freedman
P. Hartge
A. W. Hsing
J. V. Lacey
R. N. Hoover
C. Schairer
S. Graff-Iversen
R. Selmer
C. J. Bain
A. C. Green
D. M. Purdie
V. Siskind
P. M. Webb
Keywords: Medicine
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2012
Abstract: Background: Only about half the studies that have collected information on the relevance of women's height and body mass index to their risk of developing ovarian cancer have published their results, and findings are inconsistent. Here, we bring together the worldwide evidence, published and unpublished, and describe these relationships. Methods and Findings: Individual data on 25,157 women with ovarian cancer and 81,311 women without ovarian cancer from 47 epidemiological studies were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. Adjusted relative risks of ovarian cancer were calculated, by height and by body mass index. Ovarian cancer risk increased significantly with height and with body mass index, except in studies using hospital controls. For other study designs, the relative risk of ovarian cancer per 5 cm increase in height was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.09; p<0.001); this relationship did not vary significantly by women's age, year of birth, education, age at menarche, parity, menopausal status, smoking, alcohol consumption, having had a hysterectomy, having first degree relatives with ovarian or breast cancer, use of oral contraceptives, or use of menopausal hormone therapy. For body mass index, there was significant heterogeneity (p<0.001) in the findings between ever-users and never-users of menopausal hormone therapy, but not by the 11 other factors listed above. The relative risk for ovarian cancer per 5 kg/m2increase in body mass index was 1.10 (95% CI, 1.07-1.13; p<0.001) in never-users and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99; p = 0.02) in ever-users of hormone therapy. Conclusions: Ovarian cancer is associated with height and, among never-users of hormone therapy, with body mass index. In high-income countries, both height and body mass index have been increasing in birth cohorts now developing the disease. If all other relevant factors had remained constant, then these increases in height and weight would be associated with a 3% increase in ovarian cancer incidence per decade. © 2012 Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian Cancer.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84860157091&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51923
ISSN: 15491676
15491277
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.