Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Can public GAP standards reduce agricultural pesticide use? The case of fruit and vegetable farming in northern Thailand
Authors: Pepijn Schreinemachers
Iven Schad
Prasnee Tipraqsa
Pakakrong M. Williams
Andreas Neef
Suthathip Riwthong
Walaya Sangchan
Christian Grovermann
Keywords: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Issue Date: 12-Jun-2012
Abstract: In response to the chronic overuse and misuse of pesticides in agriculture, governments in Southeast Asia have sought to improve food safety by introducing public standards of good agricultural practices (GAP). Using quantitative farm-level data from an intensive horticultural production system in northern Thailand, we test if fruit and vegetable producers who follow the public GAP standard use fewer and less hazardous pesticides than producers who do not adhere to the standard. The results show that this is not the case. By drawing on qualitative data from expert interviews and an action research project with local litchi ("lychee") producers we explain the underlying reasons for the absence of significant differences. The qualitative evidence points at poor implementation of farm auditing related to a program expansion that was too rapid, at a lack of understanding among farmers about the logic of the control points in the standard, and at a lack of alternatives given to farmers to manage their pest problems. We argue that by focusing on the testing of farm produce for pesticide residues, the public GAP program is paying too much attention to the consequences rather than the root cause of the pesticide problem; it needs to balance this by making a greater effort to change on-farm practices. © 2012 The Author(s).
ISSN: 0889048X
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.