Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50200
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNahathai Wongpakaranen_US
dc.contributor.authorTinakon Wongpakaranen_US
dc.contributor.authorPutipong Bookamanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorManee Pinyopornpanishen_US
dc.contributor.authorBenchalak Maneetonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeerasak Lerttrakarnnonen_US
dc.contributor.authorKasem Uttawichaien_US
dc.contributor.authorSurin Jiraniramaien_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T04:26:23Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T04:26:23Z-
dc.date.issued2011-07-05en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712296en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-79959703147en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1186/1471-2296-12-65en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79959703147&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50200-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Delirium is a common illness among elderly hospitalized patients. However, under-recognition of the condition by non-psychiatrically trained personnel is prevalent. This study investigated the performance of family physicians when detecting delirum in elderly hospitalized Thai patients using the Thai version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) algorithm. Methods. A Thai version of the CAM algorithm was developed, and three experienced Thai family physicians were trained in its use. The diagnosis of delirium was also carried out by four fully qualified psychiatrists using DSM-IV TR criteria, which can be considered the gold standard. Sixty-six elderly patients were assessed with MMSE Thai 2002, in order to evaluate whether they had dementia upon admission. Within three days of admission, each patient was interviewed separately by a psychiatrist using DSM-IV TR, and a family physician using the Thai version of the CAM algorithm, with both sets of interviewers diagnosing for delirium. Results: The CAM algorithm tool, as used by family physicians, demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.9% and a specificity of 100.0%, with a PPV of 100.0% and an NPV of 90.6%. Interrater agreement between the family physicians and the psychiatrists was good (Cohen's Kappa = 0.91, p < 0.0001). The mean of the time the family physicians spent using CAM algorithm was significantly briefer than that of the psychiatrists using DSM-IV TR. Conclusions: Family physicians performed well when diagnosing delirium in elderly hospitalized Thai patients using the Thai version of the CAM algorithm, showing that this measurement tool is suitable for use by non-psychiatrically trained personnel, being short, quick, and easy to administer. However, proper training on use of the algorithm is required. © 2011 Wongpakaran et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDiagnosing delirium in elderly Thai patients: Utilization of the CAM algorithmen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleBMC Family Practiceen_US
article.volume12en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.